Election 2002 Home » News
»
When race becomes an issue
Garwin
Davis, Assistant News Editor
|
Prime
Minister P.J. Patterson greets Opposition Leader, Edward
Seaga, prior to the start of the Jamaica National Debate
2002 last Thursday.
|
PRIME
Minister P. J. Patterson last year at a political meeting
in Westmoreland was adamant that the so-called "race
card" would not be an issue in the general election campaign
which, at the time, was still some way off.
According
to Mr. Patterson, contrary to the widely-held view that his
party has been using Opposition Leader Edward Seaga's race
as a convenient weapon, "I have not and would never"
subscribe to the practice.
And
he didn't stop there. Realising the comment was in stark contrast
to earlier utterances, he then went about clarifying what
probably has to be one of the more controversial remarks coming
from a man who has never been known for excesses.
Mr.
Patterson said when he spoke during the '97' election campaign
that he could easily leave from the platform of a stage to
mingle with an audience without being a standout, it was not
a case of him playing the race card.
"I
never intended it as a racist statement," he explained.
"It had nothing to do with race but only to show how
easy it is for me to relate to people. Even the children in
my constituency, they don't refer to me as Prime Minister
or Mr. Patterson. For them, it's just P. J."
A
year later, what should we make of the Prime Minister's comments?
Is
race truly an issue in the annals of local politics or is
it more of a myth as Mr. Patterson seemed to have been saying?
Has the race card been used to telling effect against Eddie
Seaga and the JLP?
"Of
course it has," explained Mitzie Seaga, former wife of
the Opposition Leader. "It is very sad how the PNP has
used race over the years as a campaign tool against Mr. Seaga...and
for what...for the sake of holding on to state power. He doesn't
talk about it much but I know it hurts him deeply."
Any
bearing on election?
Mrs.
Seaga, a former Miss Jamaica World and whose marriage to Mr.
Seaga spanned over 20 years and resulting in three children
said the racial abuse and "demonisation" of her
former husband have been particularly hard on their children,
noting "we have all been hurt by this constant abuse."
"They
have seen their father sacrifice family to serve his country
only to be treated like this," she said. "It's so
ironic that the other day when Mr. Seaga was celebrating 40
years all these glowing tributes came in from the PNP side
of the aisle. Now with the campaign on in earnest he has been
transformed again into this evil man."
But
is there anything to suggest that the race card has any bearing
on the electorate? Does it weigh on the minds of voters when
they go into the voting booth?
Analysts
appear mixed in their views.
Social
commentator John Maxwell doesn't believe race has ever decided
the outcome of an election.
In
an earlier interview, he said, "I don't believe a person's
race has ever determined the outcome of an election but I
can tell you that it has always been a factor in the Prime
Minister's life. When he first entered politics in 1969, the
theme of his campaign was the song, Young, Gifted and Black.
He
explained that past victories at the polls by white candidates,
dating back to Roy Lindo in 1944, Morris Cargill in the federal
elections in 1958, the Gallimore dynasty in South Western
St. Ann, starting from 1944, to Danny Melville and Ronald
Thwaites in 1997, only serves to dispel the notion that race
has ever been a factor in deciding elections.
Political
analyst Dr. D.K. Duncan thinks the race card is alive and
well and, according to him, does have a subliminal kind of
impact.
"It
was there even when you had Michael Manley who, ironically,
had some of the same features as Mr. Seaga," Dr. Duncan
said."When you got the black Patterson that was when
it really worked. What's very unfortunate though is when things
are taken out of context to make Mr. Seaga look bad...things
like the black scandal bag...the John Crow beads...the way
things have been spun out of control have been very sad."
PNP
officials, however, are of the view that Mr. Seaga "has
been his own worst enemy" and has been a victim of "his
own utterances" rather than race.
"It
has never been about his race...its more Seaga the person,"
one senior PNP official said yesterday. "Would you deny
that the things that are written about Mr. Seaga are of his
own doing? The PNP didn't put words in his mouth."
And
how does Mr. Seaga feel?
"The
only time I allow these things to bother me is when I know
a lie has been told," he said in an interview on Friday.
"I am more black than many of them that are talking...they
haven't been in the communities I have been in...eat the food
I have had or slept in the beds I have slept in...I have been
among the people all my life...I have seen the struggles and
have lived the struggles."
|