Election 2002 Home » News
»
Campaign finance reform - coming to your government
soon
By
Andrew Green, Staff Reporter
Politicians
have a task ahead in trying to convince the country that tax
dollars should be used to finance political campaigns.
There
is little doubt that the present dependence on private sponsorship
to finance election campaigns leaves the political process
open to the danger of corruption. But implementing a reform
programme will take some delicacy.
"Every
weekend there has been a lot of activity, and it all costs
money," said general secretary of the Peoples National
Party (PNP) senator Maxine Henry-Wilson. Speaking about the
present campaign in a recent interview she said, "Invariably,
every candidate ends up indebted after the elections."
The
ruling PNP expects to spend a minimum of $250 million on the
campaign, most of this from corporate sponsorship. But many
donors prefer to fund the central organisation rather than
individual candidates, she said.
"While
the central party spends a certain amount, but a lot of money
is spent in the constituencies," Jamaica Labour Party
treasurer Chris Bovell said. "We will give some assistance
where we can, but each constituency has its fund.
The
JLP expects to spend about half of the PNP's outlay on the
election, and as with the PNP, sponsors are more generous
to the central organisation than the individual candidates.
Party
activities are financed from dues, fund-raising activities
and private contributions from individuals and companies.
With stringent financial controls and relatively generous
corporate sponsorship, both parties speak confidently about
the standards maintained at the central level, unlike the
situation in the constituencies.
"We
don't take any money that is in any way tainted," Mrs.
Henry-Wilson said of the central party organisation. Then
she added, "We try not to take any money that is any
way tainted."
When
interest groups are making donations to the party, Mr. Bovell
said, "We have always made it clear to people that if
they are giving, they give for democracy and the two party
system and they can't expect any kind of special treatment."
The
two parties may be resolved to avoid any taint of corruption
at the central level, but some say even that resolution has
not proved adequate. Campaigning without a budget, United
People's Party (UPP) president Antoinette Haughton-Cardenas
said, unlike the two main parties "we do not have 500
people who owe us favours or who hope we will do something
for them and will give us money."
Both
the JLP and PNP are getting "big money," said New
Jamaica Alliance (NJA) general secretary Mike Williams. "But
it is not just from corporate sponsors that they get the money."
There
are not more than 100 major corporate sponsors in Jamaica
and, "we know them," Mr. Williams said. "Little
money is flowing from them as their businesses are under pressure."
Independent
Senator Trevor Munroe has stated that the public perception
of growing corruption in politics, arising from the funding
of political parties, could erode the island's democracy and
weaken the state. ``Ways in which campaign finance has been
effected include paying for advertising, grants to legislators,
tax relief to contributors, free broadcasting and other kinds
of subsidies.
In
many jurisdictions private contributions have to be disclosed
and limits placed on the amount that can be given.
Professor
Munroe's brought a resolution to the Senate calling for the
establishment of a national commission to examine and make
recommendations for registering political parties and providing
them with public funding to counter the threat of corruption.
That resolution was passed by the Senate earlier this year
and now awaits a decision by government.
And
both main political parties agree on the need for reform.
"I am strongly in favour of state funding," Mr.
Bovell said when asked his stance on campaign finance.
"One
of the things we have to look at seriously is the whole question
of public funding of elections," said general secretary
Maxine Henry-Wilson when she was asked the question. The problem
is that "People see it as politics and there are questions
whether taxpayers' money should be used for these things,"
Mrs. Henry-Wilson said. "But I think there is also an
argument to be made for the preservation of democracy and
ensuring that money does not become the basis of decision
making."
It
is important to inform the public about what is happening,
and provide the necessary accountability and control, the
PNP executive said. It has to be done in a manner which will
benefit the public.
"But
that is for the next government," Mr. Bovell said. "Right
now we have to use the same methods
|