Home
» Articles »
Rights, freedoms as electoral issues
Martin
Henry
NOW
THAT the gate fly and the election date is set for Wednesday,
October 16, it is even more critical to focus on the fundamental
issues of governance for development. There is no issue more
basic than the obligation of the state "to promote universal
respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedom"
both by itself and by citizens.
The
scholarship of political economy over more than 200 years
and the practical experiments for human development by various
means have led to the very simple but profound conclusion
that human development depends on, and enlarges, human rights
and freedoms. Rights and freedoms are ends in themselves based
on the 'inherent dignity' of persons from the endowment of
their Creator. But as the UNDP Human Development Report has
been hammering home year after year since 1990, the protection
of fundamental rights and freedoms are essential for both
economic and social development. Economic and political freedoms
cannot be separated.
The
Prime Minister and president of the PNP "fly the gate"
on Sunday night in Half-Way Tree at the largest roadblock
political meeting in the political history of Jamaica. The
next night, the JLP was to have mounted their own roadblock.
The
brute numbers blocking the road matter more than the issues.
Both major political parties think nothing of denying citizens
their freedom of movement by blocking off roads for mass meetings,
and placing citizens at risk from the recklessness and hooliganism
associated with motorcades and the bussing of supporters to
these meetings. Businesses and schools must close as people's
property rights and education rights are invaded.
And
we are surprised that in Government neither the PNP nor the
JLP has consistently acted as if the protection and advancement
of human rights is the most fundamental and sacred obligation
of the state. We have virtually limited rights and freedoms
issues in public discussion to matters of police excesses,
and justice through the courts. I am seeking to broaden that
discussion as an election issue. We have a right to go where
we please along public thoroughfares in Jamaica. We have a
right to enjoy peace and quiet in our homes. We have a right
to a sound currency as a reliable store of our wealth. We
have a right to information about the operations of our Government.
As
reported by this newspaper last week (Sept 19), a youth caucus
in Western Jamaica called YARD Youth for Active Reformation
and Development -- is calling for the parties and candidates
to "debate the issues now." They are not just calling
but have generated their agenda of concerns at a conference
on "Politics and Governance in Jamaica: A Youth Perspective."
YARD, and youth in general like those in G2K and the Patriots,
should be careful not to frame the issues predominantly in
economic terms as the entire population has been trained to
do by too many years of political propagandising for economic
growth by political means.
Jamaica
is the world's best case study that growth will not take place
and cannot be sustained, if it briefly shows up, without a
secure foundation of law and order and the general protection
of rights and freedoms. The politics of seeking, promising
and trying to deliver youth benefits and other factional benefits
has been clearly shown not to work. The call for "urgent
changes to the existing system of governance" must seek
the health of the general polity under the rule of law with
full respect for rights and freedoms so that people can seek
and build wealth for themselves and the nation in peace and
security.
The
Sunday Gleaner of Sept 21, re-ran Carl Stone's 1988 column
on the importance of the youth vote. The passage of 14 years
has seen the growth of apathy among young voters, not the
promised growth of the economy or of jobs for youths including
university graduates. We have witnessed the growth of murders
in which youth predominate as both victims and perpetrators,
not the growth of educational performance to a significant
degree or of social well-being.
Those
who "disproportionately determine who sits in Jamaica
House" should take the trouble to frame the election
issues in terms of the long-term prospects of the country,
that is in terms of rights and freedoms under the democratic
rule of law for development.
The
Charter of Rights and Freedoms says, "all persons in
Jamaica are entitled to preserve for themselves and future
generations the fundamental rights and freedoms to which they
are entitled." How are those rights and freedoms to be
preserved? We are witnessing a progressive erosion of the
rule of law as the great guarantor of rights and freedoms.
The
erosion is manifested in many very visible ways: The exercise
of community justice in out-of-bounds sub-states, the murder
rate which places Jamaica third or fourth in the world with
very few perpetrators being ever brought to justice, the use
of terrorist murders to silence witnesses and pervert the
course of justice in the courts, the routine occurrence of
extra-judicial killings by the security arm of the state,
the development of a 'fortress democracy' replete with garrisons
and guns, voter fraud and calls for electronic voting.
RULES
AND REGULATIONS
The
rules and regulations for social and economic well-being are
widely disregarded both by the agencies of the state and by
citizens: zoning, vending, squatting, road use, noise, litter
and dumping and breaching other environmental laws, roadblocks,
extortion, praedial larceny. The list is long.
If
the progressive erosion of the rule of law in practice is
such a threat to our rights and freedoms and prospects of
development, then the progressive erosion of our economic
rights is no less a threat. Nowhere is this erosion more evident
than in the debt burden, one of the highest in the world as
a proportion of GDP, and growing. The Budget for yet another
fiscal year is running a significant deficit. And the Government
is relying on 'deferred financing' to push through pre-election
'development' projects. That is, revenue not yet collected
is being spent and the treasury is empty. What is this but
the fraudulent misappropriation of future resources?
These
strategies of short-term gain for long-term pain have been
used by both traditional political parties in power. Coupled
with the debasement of the currency and the abject failure
of Government to protect property rights by law enforcement,
debt is destroying our economic rights and freedoms. Economic
and political rights and freedoms are inextricably bound together.
With
20 days to go, let us make the primary issues of rights and
freedoms in a free democratic society under the rule of law
the cornerstone of the election agenda and insistently follow
the winners into the House with these same very basic concerns.
Martin
Henry is a communications consultant.
|