Home
» Articles »
The
battle for victory
Dr. D.K. Duncan Contributor
JUST
UNDER four weeks remain before the Jamaican electorate go
to the polls to elect a new Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) administration
or to re-elect the People's National Party (PNP) to govern
for a fourth consecutive term.
The
13th parliamentary general elections, since the introduction
of Universal Adult Suffrage in 1944, to be contested by both
traditional parties (JLP and PNP) will be all over before
the end of October.
The
Guessing Game for the ninth contested parliamentary general
elections, since the independence general election of April
1962, will finally end. Hopefully, for the 2007 general elections,
we will have agreed to fixed dates for elections - parliamentary
and local. Relegating this counterproductive aspect of our
political culture to the bowels of history could contribute
to really making September 2002, a month to remember.
The
findings of the party standings in the Gleaner/ Anderson
Poll conducted between August 1 and August 23 as well the
Observer/Stone Poll of August 17/18 confirm that the
stage is set for a photo finish as the
countdown continues to the October 15-17 election.
These
two national public opinion polls published in September provide
an opportunity and a basis on which to make some comparisons
and draw some conclusions.
THE
COMPARISON ANDERSON/STONE POLLS
- After
the pollster has established the sample for the population
of those 18 years and over, a critical first question to
this group is: 'ARE YOU ENUMERATED?' 71 per cent responded
yes to the Anderson interviewers whereas 82 per cent responded
yes to the Stone interviewers.
- The
number of voters registered with the Electoral Office of
Jamaica (EOJ) is approximately 1.3 million. The Statistical
Institute of Jamaica's (STATIN) 2001 Census figure for those
persons aged 18 years and over is approximately 1.59 million.
This means that 82 per cent of those person old enough to
vote have been enumerated. This validity check should encourage
the Stone Team.
- To
arrive at the figures for the party standings, the pollsters
then ask those who are enumerated ("the 82 per cent who
can vote") two additional questions.
-
One question is 'DO YOU INTEND TO VOTE?' Anderson
had a response of 77 per cent while Stone had 74 per cent.
-
The other question is - 'HOW DO YOU INTEND TO VOTE?' Anderson
asks it this way 'WHICH OF THE PARTIES DO YOU INTEND
TO VOTE FOR?' Stone asks it this way 'IF AN ELECTION
IS CALLED NOW, WHICH PARTY WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?'
Anderson
shows a combined support for all four parties (JLP, PNP, NDM/NJA,
UPP) of 54 per cent. Stone shows a combined party support
of 74 per cent. These Stone findings represent a dramatic
increase in those expressing a party preference from 57 per
cent at the end of June to this 74 per cent in mid-August,
2002 (See Table I).
When
Stone asks a separate question "Have you made up your mind
on whether you will be voting in the next election",
74 per cent of the respondents representing the just over
1.3 million persons registered to vote said YES. This figure
is therefore equivalent to those expressing their party preference
(See Table I). This means that the 'WONT SAY' category
has disappeared.
It
is also reasonable to assume that this projected 74 per cent
turnout will not increase. This could decrease by some 12
per cent based on the insight revealed in The Gleaner
article of Tuesday, September 17, 2002.
TO
CONTINUE THE COMPARISON:
- Anderson
shows an uncommitted figure those NOT showing any
party preference of 46 per cent. Stone's figure for
those Based on the Stone polls of one month ago and two
months before the election day, the PNP should continue
to command 28 relatively safe seats.
TABLE
I
Anderson/Stone
polls comparison: August 2002
(INCLUDING
THE UNCOMMITTED)
|
GENERAL
ELECTION |
ANDERSON
POLL |
STONE
POLL |
|
DEC.
18, 1997 |
AUG.
1-23 2002 |
AUG.
17/18 2002 |
JLP |
19% |
22% |
34% |
PNP |
27% |
26% |
38% |
THIRD
PARTY |
2% |
6% |
2% |
SUBTOTAL** |
48% |
54% |
74% |
TOTAL |
100% |
100% |
100% |
**
Indicate combined party preference
TABLE
II
Anderson/Stone
polls comparison: August 2002
(EXCLUDING
THE UNCOMMITTED)
|
GENERAL
ELECTION |
ANDERSON
POLL |
STONE
POLL |
|
DEC.
18, 1997 |
AUG.
1-23 2002 |
AUG.
17/18 2002 |
JLP |
39% |
41% |
46% |
PNP |
56% |
48% |
51% |
THIRD
PARTY |
5% |
11% |
3% |
TOTAL |
100% |
100% |
100% |
TABLE
III
Most
recent Stone polls compared to general election 1997 results
(EXCLUDING
THE UNCOMMITTED)
|
GENERAL
ELECTION |
STONE
POLL |
STONE
POLL |
|
DEC.
18, 1997 |
JUNE
29/30 2002 |
AUG.
17/18 2002 |
JLP |
39% |
49% |
46% |
PNP |
56% |
47% |
51% |
THIRD
PARTY |
5% |
4% |
3% |
TOTAL |
100% |
100% |
100% |
The
August 17/18 Stone polls, two months before the election day,
predict that the JLP should continue to hold its present twelve
constituencies and pick up another 11 seats.
NOT
showing a party preference is 26 per cent (See Table I).
-
In the party standings both polls show a lead of approximately
4 per cent (Anderson 3.7 per cent, Stone 3.4 per cent) by
the PNP over the JLP, when the category for the uncommitted
is included (See Table I).
-
Excluding the uncommitted this translates into a lead of
7 per cent for the PNP using the Anderson findings and 5
per cent using Stones (See Table II).
STONE
FINDINGS
SOME CONCLUSIONS
Comparing
the results of the December 1997 General Elections with the
findings of the August Stone Polls, one can draw the following
conclusions (See Table III):
-
The PNP won the 1997 General Elections by a margin of 17
points (56 per cent - 39 per cent) over the JLP.
- The
August Stone findings show a margin of 5 points (51 per
cent to 46 per cent) for the PNP over the JLP. The margin
of victory by the PNP has therefore been reduced by 12 percentage
points.
-
There is a 7 per cent increase in support for the JLP when
the August Poll figures are compared to the 1997 Election
results.
- There
is a 5 per cent decrease in the PNP support when a similar
comparison is made.
If
the trends since November 2000, continue and are reflected
in the September poll findings, the results of the October
General Elections should show that the margin separating the
two parties in the POPULAR VOTE to be very close. The SEAT
COUNT, which determines the winner, should be closer to the
1960s rather than the one-sided post-1976 results.
Based
on the 7 per cent increase in support for the JLP since the
1997 Elections:
- The
PNP should continue to command twenty-eight relatively safe
seats.
- The
JLP should continue to hold its present twelve and pick
up another 11 seats.
This
is based on the August 17/18 polls of one month ago and two
months before the election day.
This
accounts for 51 of the 60 constituencies PNP 28 and
JLP 23. This leaves nine seats outstanding. The PNP has an
advantage in five of these while the JLP could carry the other
four.
The
present projections are an advance over those made by me in
The Gleaner article headlined "TWENTY BATTLEGROUND
SEATS" published August 2, 2002. Those projections were based
on the Stone June 29/30 polls.
In
summary the PNP continues to hold 28 seats with a clear advantage
in an additional five giving them a potential seat count of
33. The JLP holds 23 with an advantage in four more for a
potential seat count of 27. These projections would hold true
for elections called up to the end of August.
In
effect, the operative situation at this time is PNP 28 seats,
the JLP 23 seats with NINE BATTLEGROUND SEATS remaining (see
Tables IV-VI).
I
still subscribe to the view expressed in my contribution to
The Gleaner's "Jamaica Decides -- ELECTION 2002"
series of Friday, September 6, 2002. I suggested that:
"The
best time electorally for the PNP to have called the
elections are gone. An announcement immediately after the
feel good successes of the Youth Games, Emancipation and Independence
celebrations was the best opportunity."
I
further suggested that the "propitious time" that the Prime
Minister told The Gleaner's Editors' Forum that he would choose
for the election date could be the subject of silent reflection
when October is over.
*
Former PNP General Secretary and Government Minister in the
PNP Adminis-tration of the 1970s. Dr. Duncan, a dental surgeon,
recently established the D.K. Duncan Political Institute.
Email: dktruth@hotmail.com
General
elections 2002
TABLE
IV
Projected
seats for the PNP*
|
CONSTITUENCY |
1997
PNP |
NDM |
PNP
|
JLP |
|
|
MARGIN
(%) |
VOTE
(%) |
CANDIDATE |
CANDIDATE |
1 |
ST.
ANDREW, S.W. |
96 |
---- |
PORTIA
SIMPSON MILLER |
GARNETT
|
2 |
ST.
ANDREW, S. |
83 0.4 |
|
OMAR
DAVIES DENNIS |
MCINTOSH
REID |
3 |
KINGSTON,
EAST |
70 |
1 |
PHILLIP
PAULWELL |
PETER
SANGSTER |
4 |
ST.
CATHERINE, S.C. |
50 |
1 |
SHARON
HAY-WEBSTER GARVEY |
TREVON
SEYMOUR |
5 |
ST.
ANDREW, E. C. |
49 |
4 |
PETER
PHILLIPS |
CLAUDE
RIDDELL |
6 |
ST.
ANN, S.E. |
49 |
2 |
ALOUN
NDOMBETASSAMBA
|
PETER
FAKHOURIE JR. |
7 |
ST.
ANDREW, WEST |
47 |
2 |
O.T.
WILLIAMS |
JOYCE
ANN YOUNG |
8 |
WESTMORELAND,
E. |
44 |
1 |
P.J.
PATTERSON |
DON
FOOTE |
9 |
ST.
ELIZABETH, N.E. |
39 |
2 |
ROGER
CLARKE |
BASIL
PERRIEL |
10 |
ST.
CATHERINE, E.C. |
38 |
6 |
K.D.
KNIGHT |
RAYMOTH
NOTICE |
11 |
MANCHESTER,
N.W. |
37 |
4 |
DEAN
PEART |
JAMES
DORAN |
12 |
ST.
CATHERINE, N.W. |
34 |
3 |
ROBERT
PICKERSGILL |
SANDRA
NESBETH |
13 |
WESTMORELAND,
W. |
34 |
21 |
WYCKHAM
MCNEIL |
PATRICK
ATKINSON |
14 |
ST.
JAMES, S. |
33 |
4 |
DERRICK
KELLIER |
CARL
RHODEN |
*The
constituencies are listed in numerical order of the percentage
margins of victory won by the PNP over the JLP.
Projected
safe seats for the PNP*
|
CONSTITUENCY |
1997
PNP |
NDM |
PNP
|
JLP |
|
|
MARGIN
(%) |
VOTE
(%) |
CANDIDATE |
CANDIDATE |
15 |
ST.
CATHERINE, S.E. |
32 |
8 |
PAUL
ROBERTSON |
ARTHUR
WILLIAMS |
16 |
PORTLAND,
EAST |
26 |
2 |
DONALD
RHODD |
DENNIS
MINOTT |
17 |
ST.
ANDREW, S.E. |
25 |
7 |
MAXINE
HENRY |
PHILLIP
HENRIQUES |
18 |
ST.
MARY, CENTRAL |
25 |
1 |
MORAIS
GUY |
SUTCLIFFE
HAUGHTON |
19 |
WESTMORELAND,
C |
25 |
4 |
KARL
BLYTHE |
TREVOR
BROOKS |
20 |
CLARENDON,
S.W. |
25 |
3 |
CHARLES
LEARMOND |
JOEL
WILLIAMS |
21 |
MANCHESTER,
S. |
23 |
2 |
MICHAEL
PEART |
NOEL
SIMPSON |
22 |
KINGSTON
CENTRAL |
21 |
0.6 |
VICTOR
CUMMINGS |
CHARLTON
COLLIE |
23 |
PORTLAND,
WEST |
20 |
----- |
ERROL
ENNIS |
KENNETH
ROWE |
24 |
MANCHESTER,
C. |
19 |
6 |
JOHN
JUNOR |
NORMAN
HORNE |
25 |
CLARENDON,
N. |
19 |
2 |
HORACE
DALLEY |
LAURENCE
BRODERICK |
26 |
ST.
CATHERINE, S. |
19 |
5 |
FITZ
JACKSON |
ERROL
WILLIAMSON |
27 |
HANOVER,
WEST |
17 |
7 |
RALSTON
ANSON |
TRAVIS
SPENCE |
28 |
TRELAWNY,
NORTH |
15 |
2 |
PATRICK
HARRIS |
CHRISTOPHER
JOHNSON |
*The
constituencies are listed in numerical order of the percentage
margins of victory won by the PNP over the JLP.
TABLE
V
Projected
safe seats for the JLP* |
|
|
CONSTITUENCY |
1997
JLP |
NDM |
JLP
|
PNP |
|
|
MARGIN
(%) |
VOTE
(%) |
CANDIDATE |
CANDIDATE |
1 |
KINGSTON,
W. |
69 |
O.2 |
EDWARD
SEAGA |
BUNNY
WITTER |
2 |
ST.
CATHERINE, C. |
30 |
30 |
BABSEY
GRANGE |
HOMER
WHITE |
3 |
ST.
ANDREW, N.W. |
26 |
10 |
DERRICK
SMITH |
NEMLA
WILSON |
4 |
CLARENDON,
C. |
22 |
4 |
MICHAEL
HENRY |
LEOPOLD
HYLTON |
5 |
ST.
ANDREW, N.E. |
15 |
15 |
DELROY
CHUCK |
LEONARD
GREEN |
6 |
ST.
ANDREW, N.C. |
10 |
15 |
KARL
SAMUDA |
BARBARA
CLARKE |
7 |
MANCHESTER,
N.E. |
9 |
13 |
AUDLEY
SHAW |
DOROTHY
MILLER |
8 |
ST.
ELIZABETH, N.W. |
4 |
3 |
J.C.
HUTCHINSON |
STANLEY
REDWOOD |
9 |
CLARENDON,
N.W. |
2 |
13 |
CLIFTON
STONE |
RICHARD
AZAN |
10 |
ST.
ANDREW, W.C. |
1 |
0.3 |
ANDREW
HOLNESS |
PATRICK
ROBERTS |
11 |
ST.
CATHERINE, N.E. |
-
0.4** |
1 |
ABE
DABDOUB |
PHYLLIS
MITCHELL |
12 |
ST.
ANN, N.E. |
-12* |
3
|
SHAHINE
ROBINSON |
CAROL
JACKSON |
13 |
CLARENDON,
S.E. |
-0.3 |
3 |
RUDDY
SPENCER |
BASIL
BURRELL |
14 |
TRELAWNY,
S. |
-2 |
11 |
DEVON
MCDANIEL |
DOREEN
CHEN |
15 |
ST.
ANDREW, W. RURAL |
-3 |
5 |
ANDREW
GALLIMORE |
CAROL
ARCHER |
16 |
ST.
THOMAS, WEST |
-3 |
2 |
JAMES
ROBERTSON |
ANTHONY
HYLTON |
17 |
ST.
ANDREW, EAST |
-4 |
11 |
ST.
AUBYN BARTLETT |
COLIN
CAMPBELL |
18 |
CLARENDON,
N.C. |
-4 |
3 |
PEARNEL
CHARLES |
GEORGE
LYN |
19 |
ST.
ANN, S.W. |
-5 |
4 |
ERNEST
SMITH |
GLENVILLE
SHAW |
20 |
ST.
ELIZABETH, S.W. |
-5 |
1 |
DERRICK
SANGSTER |
DONALD
BUCHANAN |
21 |
ST.
CATHERINE, W.C. |
-5 |
4 |
KEN
BAUGH |
ALETHIA
BARKER |
22 |
ST.
JAMES, E.C. |
-6 |
4 |
EDMUND
BARTLETT |
DONALD
COLOMATHI |
23 |
ST.
JAMES, W.C. |
-6 |
5 |
CLIVE
MULLINGS |
HUGH
SOLOMON |
*The
first 10 constituencies are listed in numerical order of the
percentage margins of victory won by the JLP over the PNP.
The other 13, listed in the negative, represents the PNP margin
of victory in the 1997 General Elections.
TABLE
VI
Battleground
seats
|
CONSTITUENCY |
1997
JLP |
NDM |
PNP |
JLP
|
|
|
MARGIN
(%) |
VOTE
(%) |
CANDIDATE |
CANDIDATE |
1 |
ST.
ANDREW, E. RURAL |
15
|
8
|
OLIVER
CLUE
|
JOSEPH
HIBBERT
|
2 |
HANOVER,
E. |
14 |
3 |
LLOYD
HILL |
BARRINGTON
GRAY |
3 |
ST.
MARY, S.E. |
13 |
5 |
HARRY
DOUGLAS |
TARN
PERALTO |
4 |
ST.
ELIZABETH, S.E. |
13 |
3 |
LENWORTH
BLAKE |
FRANKLYN
WITTER |
5 |
ST.
MARY, WEST |
12 |
2 |
NEIL
MCGILL |
HYACINTH
KNIGHT |
6 |
ST.
THOMAS, EAST |
11 |
1 |
FENTON
FERGUSON |
DENNIS
WRIGHT |
7 |
ST.
ANN, N.W. |
10 |
2 |
ARNOLD
BERTRAM |
VERNA
PARCHMENT |
8 |
ST.
JAMES, N.W. |
8 |
4 |
GORDON
BROWN |
HORACE
CHANG |
9 |
ST.
CATHERINE, S.W. |
7 |
4 |
JENNIFER
EDWARDS |
C.
EVERALD |
Compiled
by: D.K. Duncan Political Institute
|